Archive for the ‘Music’ Category

Exercising Creativity Through Limitation

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

I really like making music; it’s pretty much my favorite thing in the world to do. At this point, I think my songwriting skills are okay, or at least they’re way better than they were a few years ago. I mean, maybe you’re reading this and you’re like, “Well I don’t really like your music actually,” which is fair enough. But if I were to show you stuff I made in high school, you’d definitely be able to see improvement. Maybe I’ll do that at the end of this post.

One thing I’ve learned is that it’s ironically difficult to find the inspiration to write when you have an infinite amount of possibilities before you, which, these days, you pretty much do. Personally, if I don’t have an idea in my head already, and I’m put in a situation where I need to be creative, it doesn’t seem to happen.

Here’s an example: this fall/winter, I worked as a composer for a documentary (which should be airing in the next month or so. I’ll keep you posted). It being a science documentary, most of the music would fit into the electronica genre, which is huge. So after a while, it became extremely difficult to compose content that stood out against the torrent of music I had to pump out (keep in mind my job is to create an extensive sound bank under strict deadlines). A lot of my problem was due to the fact that everything was kind of rushed, but another part of it was because when I have a large amount of tools in front of me, I tend to just stick to the writing techniques I’m comfortable with. In a way, I was limited by my lack of limitations.

If you were to ask a cook to make three delicious one-piece meals out of items that can be found in a grocery store, chances are you’re going to end up with Shepard’s Pie, Beef Stew and Lasagna, which are all great meals. But what if you told the cook that the first meal could only use items from the ‘Asian Imports’ section, the second was to be vegetarian and the third must incorporate wine? My guess is that you’d finish with much more creative results.

When I make my own music, I find being limited is where some of my best ideas have come from; when I’m forced to make the most out of little resources, it ends up being a very different base that, when expanded upon, has great potential. And in this way, I don’t have a vast selection to stress out over.

An example of this would be this little toy keyboard I have called a Concertmate 380. I think I’ve owned this since I was about three years old and it’s one of the best purchases my parents have made. The sounds on it are super cheesy, but very unique. If you heard it, you could probably make a decent guess at what kind of device it was coming from without even seeing it. But this instrument has limitations: one of them is that you can only play two notes at a time on it.

Concertmate 380

I remember being at a youth retreat and I decided to take this thing along just for the fun of it. There’s a particular sound on it that, instead of playing just one tone, plays an interval of a perfect fifth. When I discovered this, I thought to myself, “If I can only hold down two keys at a time, but each key will play the interval of a perfect fifth, I could play 7th chords,” and I went on to create a chord progression based on only being able to play major and minor 7th chords. I remembered it, and when I got home from the retreat I made up a melody to go along with it. It’s one of my favorite musical drafts to date, and I really hope to record something soon that will incorporate that idea.

But it just goes to show you that, when you have little to work with, you’ll be forced to make something out of it that you like. Then you can remove your limitations and build on what you came up with. I’m a musician, so obviously I used musical examples. But I hope you visual artists and poets haven’t stopped reading, because I think the same could be true for you too. I’m not a visual artist, but I would encourage anyone who is to limit yourself in some way and see what you can come up with. Try using an oddly shaped canvas and see if you can make it look good; draw only with straight lines; paint something using only two of three primary colors. I don’t know. Like I said, I’m not a visual artist so I’m just saying things. But I’ve already tried this method with lyrics (since I suck at them) and it actually helped. That’s why I think it’s a helpful approach for any form of art.

This is why photographers will try out things like pinhole photography, and it’s the same concept that’s behind many forms of poetry (the haiku, acrostic, diamante, etc…)

For one of my projects at Recording Arts Canada, we were given access to a sample bank with which we had to compose a piece of music. We could only record one source; everything else had to be from the bank. This is what came of it:
Project

It’s not my best work, but I like it considering I didn’t have a lot of time to work on it and the sample bank we were working from was pretty small. In any case, it’s a good example of a situation where having to make due with what you’ve got produces great results.

I’m currently working on a song which was originally written on a Kalimba (or African Thumb Piano). Because the instrument is tuned to a certain key, and because of the way it is played (in other words, because of its limitations), I ended up with a sound that I never would’ve come up with if I had composed on a piano. So as I add accompaniment, melody and rhythm to the piece, the result is something very different from anything I’ve written before. So stay tuned for that.

You artists out there should tell me what you think, and if you end up using this method, let me know how it goes! In the meantime, here’s possibly some of the most insane electronica I’ve ever made, from my high school days:
Garbage

Genres I Hate (Generally)

Sunday, January 23rd, 2011

Note: Most of the videos in this post are songs my friends have posted. Friends that I love dearly. I just don’t share their taste in music. So if you’re one of these friends, please know that I’m not trying to insult you.

Everyone has their own musical preferences and there doesn’t necessarily have to be a reason for why that genre appeals to them. We just like certain sounds, just like we like certain foods. For instance, I really like some good House music once in a while. Of all the types of music I listen to, I can admit that House music is probably the most repetitive, but I love it anyway. I love the huge kick and the sidechained pumping feeling. But that doesn’t mean that there isn’t some really stupid House out there. Artists abuse the good things about the genre and ruin it. The pulsing gets to be too overdone, everything is sidechained, the kick is overpowering the vocals; basically, the great defining characteristics of it are taken so far that it makes it tasteless. That’s why I know I can’t criticize people’s natural preferences based on my natural dislikes. But then I realized something: I don’t have any natural dislikes. For every genre I avoid exposure to, I can give an entire list of reasons why. It’s not a matter of, “It just doesn’t appeal to me.” It’s about effort, originality and the idea behind the music, all of which are not too much to ask from a musician. So there’s my justification for why I’m about to tear down some of the biggest genres out there. I’m not doing it just to set myself apart from the norm. Just in case it hasn’t been brought to your attention, the internet has made it impossible for anyone to be the only one that likes anything. No matter how far you go to be original, you’ll always find yourself stacking your comment about how great Gregorian Chant is upon a million other comments about how great Gregorian Chant is. So here I go.

Dubstep is a genre of electronica that seems to be all the rage lately. It’s defined by really huge bass drops, often oscillating in interesting rhythmic fashion. Now, if that wasn’t all it had to it, I wouldn’t have a problem with it. But there’s nothing else. The genre in its entirety can be described as, “JAWAWAWAWAAAAAAAWOWOWOWOWOWAAAAH!” Part of the reason it bothers me is that I’m a Drum and Bass fan, which already has what Dubstep has: the bass. But it also has sweet drums, hence the name. Dubstep is the buildup or breakdown section of a Drum and Bass song, but one that consistently goes absolutely nowhere. Here’s an example of one of the biggest letdowns I’ve ever heard in music.

Notice the rising action at 0:46, followed by a huge disappointment at 0:53 and a bunch of garbage until the end of the song. This artist didn’t even bother to make the bass interesting. In fact, the song is looped to be the length it is. If it weren’t, it would be about two minutes long. I can’t figure out for the life of me how I would dance to this either. It must have the most awkward tempo and feel in all of music. The only thing I can think to do is to jerk my head forward on the snare hits. That could be because I don’t know the first thing about dance. But I thought this Pavane from the Renaissance era was the best fit.

Indie is a culture based on the idea that everything mainstream is bad. I say ‘culture’ because it really is more of a culture than it is a genre. The only difference between an Indie label and a major label is simply that it isn’t a major label. In other words, the Indie label might sign you if the major label doesn’t. But if neither will, don’t fret. You’re still Indie because you’re so independent. But when you really take a close look at it, there isn’t much of a difference between Rock and Indie Rock. The lyrics are still love and romance, and the style’s about the same too. What’s different about Indie Rock is that it’s always trying to seem so down to earth. Common themes in Indie Rock music and videos are mundane settings like garages, living rooms, coffee shops and nature; people with apathetically kept hair, skinny jeans, guitars worn high; simple, acoustic setups and percussion; songs are often poorly produced/recorded; lots of going in and out of focus with an HD camera. All this for the sake of not being mainstream, because mainstream is full of fake people apparently. Ironically, the indie culture falls completely off the other side of the horse by creating a world that’s just as fake, where artists will go the extra mile to film their music video in a tent with a bag of crushed Ichiban soup and a bucket as percussion. Here are some videos that will help get my point across:

This one has mundane elements like books, a basement setting, and a very simple drum set. It’s mixed terribly and you can actually hear the vocals distort at one point.

Here, friends are gathered in a nice, mundane, abandoned house with mundane candles and acoustic entertainment. There’s a girl holding an autoharp which we won’t get to see her play. They even specify at the beginning that it’s unedited, to establish how real everything is.

Filmed in a warehouse. There’s a snare with a blanket on it and an awkward percussion improvisation section. It’s really down to earth because they use the walls and have an egg shaker.

Country might have been the first on the list, but I thought that would have been too predictable. I remember a time where I wanted to like country. I wanted to find a country artist that I didn’t think was completely unimaginative because I know that even among genres that I generally don’t like, there are refuge bands or songs that give hope to the monotonous. For example, there are good artists under the Indie label, and there are some Dubstep songs that I can listen to for more than thirty seconds. Then I realized that I was looking in the wrong genre; I should have been looking for Bluegrass. Bluegrass requires talent and virtuosity, whereas Country rarely has any impressive or interesting elements. The two are similar in terms of what instruments generally compose them, at least, enough for people to frequently refer to Bluegrass as Country. Generally though, blue grass demonstrates more musicianship and allows for more creativity, which is why I enjoy it. Just compare these two videos:

These are my least favorite genres not because they have zero potential to be done well, but because they have the largest suck to not suck ratio. It’s  completely possible for the sounds that characterize them to evolve into something better, but I haven’t heard much improvement from these genres in particular. If someone innovative were to come and elevate these styles to their full capacity, it would be a great day in music history, but that takes time and inspiration. There’s enough out there to keep me happy in the meantime.

How Deep the Father’s Love For Us (Choral Arrangement)

Friday, October 15th, 2010

Alrighty, so about two weeks ago I was randomly inspired to write a choral arrangement of this modern hymn, “How Deep the Father’s Love For Us” by Stuart Townend. So I did. I changed the chords for each verse so it wouldn’t be too boring. I also added some interludes. I sure wish I knew some people who I could sing this with. I might eventually record it part by part with my brother. We’ll see. Until then, enjoy the terrible MIDI version!

MP3

Transcription of Sunshine

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

Note: Tenor3 and Baritone are Tenor Clefs, so don’t press the play button that’s on the sheet music. The online score-writing program doesn’t have the option of a Tenor clef (and by Tenor clef I don’t mean viola Tenor clef; I mean the Treble clef with the ‘8′ under it) so it will play both the Baritone and 3rd Tenor parts an octave too high, which makes some sections in the song sound terrible. To hear a more accurate MIDI, click here.

Another thing to keep in mind is that in the produced version of this arrangement, Cadence cheated a bit by layering more than five parts in places. I didn’t want to add three more voices that would only appear once in the whole score, so I worked around it. Therefore, some parts might sound a little scarce but generally I think it sounds pretty good.

I highly recommend noteflight.com as a free alternative to other score-writing programs. You’ll find it limits you in quite a few areas, depending on what you’re composing for, so it would be a good idea to make sure it has everything you need before diving into a composition, transcription or arrangement. But if you just need notes and text, it works quite well and it’s easy to share with people afterward.

Analysis of Lyrical Techniques

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

What a boring sounding title…

As many of you probably know, since I complain about it so much, I suck at writing lyrics. It’s really frustrating because I want to be a musician. And even though I love instrumentals, according to my friends, people prefer music with lyrics. My guess is that they like having something to sing along to. To be honest, I highly doubt it has much to do with the message. If that were true, people wouldn’t listen to artists who shamelessly project immoral images of women, artists whose lyrics are so abstract that you can only pretend you have the slightest idea of what they mean, or artists who just relentlessly remind you that “tonight’s gonna be a good night,” and tell you to “get retarded.” Still, if I’m going to write lyrics, I want them to be good so the people with taste won’t make fun of me.

I should make it clear ahead of time that this post is written from an observatory point of view. I’m only going to point out what I see other artists doing. I won’t be giving any advice, since I’m the last person to take advice from on the topic. I thought it might be interesting though, and it may be helpful to others who are interested in lyric writing.

I find that when I sit down and attempt to write some words, I get nowhere because I have no starting point; no idea whatsoever where to even begin. Whereas, when I write music, I start with either a melody or a chord progression, a key, a time signature, and usually a general feel for what the song’s going to sound like. I feel like it might help me to have a similar starting point when I write lyrics. The aspects of poetry though, are completely different than the aspects of music. Instead, you have things like a subject, a form, a rhyme scheme maybe, ect… but there’s my problem: I don’t know as much about poetry as I do about music. So that’s why I decided to separate different types of lyrical techniques into groups. Then when I want to write, I can pick a technique that would work with the point I want to get across and stick to its characteristics, instead of just winging it. So here are my six groups:

Subject Analysis:

Basically, the authors of these types of songs a) pick a subject and b) describe it. That’s it. But obviously, the deeper they go and the more literary tricks they fit in, the more interesting it will be. For instance, if our subject was something totally simple, like a chair, you’d have to go above and beyond just describing it physically. What do you use it for, what’s its origin, what are the good and bad things about it, if it could speak, what would it say, if it could move, what would it do, and what is it a metaphor for? Four.

So here’s what I have for a chair: It’s a slave, it’s for sitting on, it’s probably inspired by someone’s lap, it’s reliable, looks like a person trapped in a sitting position forever, and it would probably want to get up and sit on you if it could. So…

———

Isn’t fair to be a chair

Rolling chair goes anywhere

Ne’er shall dare to sit on you

Chair shall bare the weight of two

———

Maybe you think that’s a stupid example. You’re probably right. But here’s a song that demonstrates this type of lyrical technique perfectly: Words by The Real Group.

Abstract:

This one doesn’t require a whole lot of explanation, much like an abstract art teacher probably doesn’t have to explain to a student how to properly splatter paint all over a canvas. Basically the instructions are (in my opinion) a) start somewhere, b) go anywhere, and c) finish somehow. Whether or not you have a message in it is up to you, since no one will be able to tell the difference anyway. Here’s mine:

———

Battlefish, guard your lair

You are sacred starfish slayer

With a chain of food you fight

Strangling foes all through the night

———

Why not? Who’s going to tell you your abstract lyrics are bad? No one, because they just don’t understand the depth of your wisdom. Here’s an example: Blink by Infected Mushroom.

Narrative:

This one is cool in my opinion, and of all the songs I’ve written with lyrics (two), it’s worked out the best. It’s really versatile because you don’t have to ever write the story yourself. Lyricists will write about stories that already exist all the time. It can be any story that inspires you. Of course, if you want to write a story in lyrical form, that’s awesome as well. Just do what stories do, but in poetry form: develop characters, follow a plot, use butt loads of literary techniques.

———

Once upon a time there lived a little lazy leopard

If sleeping was a sport, he would set a new record

One night he heard a howl on a hill up high

It was his friend, wolf, singing sadly at the sky

ect…

———

I wish there was somewhere that would tell me how many songs have been written about Romeo and Juliet. And if there was, it would also tell me how many of them mention the fact that they both commit suicide at the end. Taylor Swift sure doesn’t. Here’s a story one: Duct Tape My Heart by Freezepop!

Dialogue:

Have you ever been a girl? If so, have you ever had some awkward guy write you an awkward song and insist on singing it awkwardly in front of you? I hope not, but unfortunately, it happens. This is that kind of song, and unfortunately they’re usually lame like that. But not always. Basically you just pick a subject/conflict and talk to that person about it in poetry form. Ask questions, criticize, compliment, make statements and make demands. You can even make it a conversation where both sides speak. It’s also good if you come to some sort of conclusion at the end, just to put our minds at ease.

———

You and me should hang out more

I know we should, let’s talk some more

I like your hair, I like your face

I think it’s cool you own a mace

etc…

———

So far all mine have been in AABB form… that’s how original I am! Here’s a song like this we all know and love: I Believe in a Thing Called Love by The Darkness.

Praise or Knock:

Authors of these songs pick something they love/hate and talk about how great/terrible it is. If you want a highly concentrated dose of this style of lyric writing, listen to worship music. It’s probably the best example. This one’s actually similar to subject analysis, but you concentrate on the pros or cons, not both. What would life be like without it, what would life be like with more of it, who can we thank for it, and what grand things does it do?

———

Topping conversation with a warm cordiality

A promisesland containing milk and honey

Its absence defines an arctic reality

With it, China makes some money

———

It’s about tea. It’s up to you whether or not you want to make that clear in the lyrics, or let people figure it out. Also I totally went ABAB there. Leave me a high five in the comment section. By the way, I almost made a seventh category, but I decided it fits in this one. It’s those songs where people fantasize about things they don’t have. If I Had a Million Dollars by the Barenaked Ladies is one that comes to mind. But really it’s just praise, but for something you don’t have. I’m too much of a positive person to be able to think of any knocks off the top of my head… but here’s a good praise one: California Girls by The Beach Boys!

Interrogation:

In these songs, there’s usually some sort of mystery that the writer can’t resolve. So they admit their confusion and ask tons of questions about it. Or sometimes they know the answer, but they still ask questions to make the listener figure it out for themselves. You’ve got your whens, whys, wheres, whos, whats and hows. Also, will it, must it, has it, was it and did it? Go ahead and hypothesize a bit, just to give us a break from all the questions.

———

What would a coin say could it speak?

Would it boast of its travels week by week?

Complain about being placed face down?

Or being dropped on the ground and  chased around?

———

I actually really like this method because it forces the listener to think more. At least, I tend to think more upon being asked than being told. Anyway, here: What if His People Prayed by Casting Crowns.

So that’s it. Hopefully this view on lyric writing will make me suck less at it. If not, it’s just kind of an interesting way to look at the way people write songs. There are probably more categories that I missed, but I think the majority can be placed into these ones. And hopefully you’ll think about this every time you hear a song ever.

P.S. If you’re a lyricist or a poet, feel free to leave me some tips.